Zohran Mamdani’s recent electoral victory marks a significant turning point for New York City, a metropolis that has long grappled with the influence of corporate power on its political landscape. Among the most notable figures he has chosen for his transition team is Lina Khan, the former Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This decision has sparked both excitement and scrutiny as Mamdani crafts his administration and seeks to navigate the complex challenges facing the city.

One of the criticisms of Mamdani during his campaign was his relative lack of substantial work experience to take on the immense responsibilities of running New York City. Nevertheless, his selection of key personnel, particularly Khan, indicates a clear vision for a more equitable political landscape, signaling a move away from the entrenched corporate interests that have pervaded City Hall for decades.

Khan, known for her progressive stances and her focus on antitrust law, has faced her share of inquiries regarding her managerial effectiveness during her tenure at the FTC. Critics have pointed out allegations of dysfunction within the agency and difficulties in prosecuting significant cases. However, in the realm of governance, it is the collective strength of a team that often rescues individual shortcomings. The inclusion of prominent figures like Elana Leopold, Melanie Hartzog, Maria Torres-Springer, and Grace Bonilla in Mamdani’s transition team aims to balance the varied skill sets required to rebuild trust between the government and the citizens it serves.

A central theme communicated through Khan’s remarks following Mamdani’s victory is the rejection of a political system heavily influenced by corporate money. Her statement encapsulated a growing sentiment in New York: “What we saw last night was New Yorkers not just electing a new mayor, but clearly rejecting a politics where outsized corporate power and money too often end up dictating our politics.” This resonant call to action reflects a desire among constituents for an administration that prioritizes the needs of everyday New Yorkers over the demands of affluent stakeholders.

The recent rhetoric from business leaders threatening to abandon the city if their demands are not met raises an interesting question. Are the fears of a mass exodus from New York more fabrications of corporate posturing than genuine concerns? While it’s true that the threats foster an air of uncertainty, the reality is that many New Yorkers are resilient and deeply connected to their city. Mamdani’s approach, grounded in accessibility and stability, may very well embolden the working class to demand equitable solutions whether the ultra-wealthy remain or depart.

Khan’s strategic placement on the transition team serves as a stark reminder to powerful corporate interests that their influence may soon diminish, forcing them to reassess their approach. As this new administration strives for meaningful change, it’s apparent that the goal will be to reinvigorate the city’s economy while restoring the balance of power to its citizens. With Khan’s emphasis on fighting for the average person and her advocacy for antitrust policies, Mamdani appears poised to instigate significant shifts in governance.